Response to: Should you pay less for your education?

There has always been a controversy on subisides given to certain thigns so that they can be funded. One certain controversy that involves subsidies is on ethanol fuel and whether it should be funded so that it can be in ful stream use. Another subsidy controversy is a funded public school system and public universities. The problem is that people think that taxpayers shouldn't need to pay so much for a school system that they aren't involved in. This shouldn't even be a situation that is argued because we need to educate the future of our nation. Without funds and money from the taxpayers going into the school system in towns then there will be no school system for our children to get educated. The amount of money that is going into the schools is just right because right now, education is at a high level and test scores are increasing along with graduate numbers. There are a great amount of students that are being successful in our schools right now and a lot of students are graduating and for something to be changed it would not be good for the school system. Also for universities, they don't need a good amount of subsidies but as part of a local community or state then there needs to be funds to keep the campus going. Subsidies that colleges receive will make the campus look up to date and not dirt, and it will keep the school in the town and the students